"The SOLO taxonomy is a model that describes levels of increasing complexity in students’ thinking and understanding. SOLO, which stands for the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome, is a means of classifying learning outcomes in terms of their complexity, enabling us to assess students’ work in terms of its quality not of how many bits of this and of that they have got right. SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) provides a model for different levels of understanding, including surface, deep and conceptual (Biggs and Collis 1982). Check out this clip on the SOLO taxonomy – explained using lego! Check out this clip on the SOLO taxonomy – explained using lego! Twitter: @helpfulprof. Solo Taxonomy for Self/Peer Assessment - Solo Taxonomy with levels (for Medicine through Time History - though this can be adapted). “SOLO Taxonomy provides asimple and robust way ofdescribing how learningoutcomes grow in complexityfrom surface to deepunderstanding”Biggs & Collis 1982 8. Biggs argues that the essence of the extended abstract response “is that it goes beyond what has been given” (Biggs & Tang, 2007, p. 87). SOLO taxonomy Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy is a model that classifies learning outcomes according to their complexity. Chris Drew (aka the Helpful Professor) is a university educator and former school teacher. It helps you think through what grade you will give a student by explicitly outlining how to identify depth of understanding. It’s all about increasing the levels of complexity in tasks as pupils move through their learning. And yes, Party B won. SOLO taxonomy SOLO taxonomy was developed by Australian academics Biggs and Collis (1982) and is a method of describing the level of increasing Nov 22, 2015 - Explore Sharon Metcalf's board "Solo taxonomy" on Pinterest. Extended abstract – The previous integrated whole may be conceptualised at a higher level of abstraction and generalised to a new topic or area. At the extended abstract stage, students have a sophisticated understanding of the topic and can apply it in various contexts. At the relational level, students start to see how the parts of a topic are put together. Verbs from the Taxonomy 5. SOLO Taxonomy at Lime Tree We are using SOLO Taxonomy to: Provide a structure for planning and to enable the pupils to progress through the stages as they learn: - Key skills, concepts and knowledge (Unistructural and Multistructural) - To apply skills in contexts with support (Relational) CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication, “I’m parroting what I am supposed to say”, or. We use Solo stands for "structure of the observed learning outcome". It introduces the basics of SOLO with the symbols for each of the 5 levels (taken from Pam Hook). For example, consider the following four questions about the solar system (adapted from Hattie & Purdie, 1998): Unistructural: “Which planet is furthest from the sun?”. The diagram lists verbs typical of each such level. An example of this level of thinking would be to analyze an historical event and use this knowledge to predict the outcome of a current event. The taxonomy provides vocabulary that clearly conveys what students should be able to demonstrate by the end of a course. in a nutshell – SOLO Stations is a fantastic way of incorporating SOLO into the existing Carousel technique we use all the time! A much less known taxonomy of assessing student learning is SOLO, which was created by John Biggs and Kevin Collis in 1982. Questions can be formulated at each level of the SOLO taxonomy to ask progressively deeper, or higher-order, questions. Sources Cited. SOLO has advantages over Bloom's cognitive taxonomy (Bloom 1965), the traditional taxonomy for differentiating learning experiences. SOLO taxonomy. A comparison is made between van Hiele levels of development in geometry and the structure of learning outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy. Pre-structural: o No understanding. Evaluating the Quality of Learning. The structure of observed learning outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy is a model that describes levels of increasing complexity in student's understanding of subjects. SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) taxonomy developed by Biggs and Collis (1982), also categorises levels of thinking and learning in terms of complexity, thus being useful when we want to examine the quality of student learning and understanding. It is an approach designed by educational psychologists John Biggs and Kevin Collis to scaffold higher-order thinking for pupils. This is how we measure the level of a learner’s understanding, thinking and/or skills, and is how we help them identify their next steps in learning. Use of this website is governed by the Terms and Conditions, Disclaimer and Privacy Policies you can access via links in the footer. It aids both trainers and learners in understanding the learning process. This study aims to determine the extent to which the students 'thinking level based on SOLO taxonomy in geometry learning viewed from students' self efficacy (SE). The student’s knowledge remains at the level of remembering, memorizing and parroting what they have learned. A much less known taxonomy of assessing student learning is SOLO, which was created by John Biggs and Kevin Collis in 1982. Are at an appropriate ability level in relation to the summative assessment. What is Solo taxonomy? Final Thoughts 7. SOLO was first described by Kevin Collis and myself in Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy (New York: Academic Press, 1982, now out of print, but available in Chinese). Admittedly, when we first begun researching about the taxonomy, we did find it difficult to understand and … For example, a student may laern something in the classroom and be able to apply it in their lives outsive the classroom in an entirely different context. It is a model that describes levels of increasing complexity in a learner's understanding of subjects (Biggs, Collis, 1982). The SOLO taxonomy not only suggests an item writing methodology, but the same taxonomy can be used to score the items. o Misses the point. The SOLO taxonomy. This may be because they’ve never encountered it before! Using the SOLO model to analyze competence progression of university science curricula. The five SOLO Taxonomy levels are: Prestructural: The learning is new to the student. require extreme difficulty to reach levels 3 or 4 of the taxonomy. Unlike Bloom’s taxonomy, the verbs in the SOLO taxonomy are all observable, making them ideal for assessments. See more ideas about solo taxonomy, higher order thinking, classroom walls. Criteria for each level based on SOLO taxonomy can be seen in Table 1 [17] [18]. It is a part of his broader concept of constructive alignment. 5 Levels of the Taxonomy3. Some examples are below:eval(ez_write_tag([[728,90],'helpfulprofessor_com-leader-2','ezslot_9',659,'0','0'])); By contrast, the SOLO taxonomy focuses on outcomes of knowledge rather than descriptions of knowledge itself. SOLO Taxonomy Summary This describes the importance of assessment as a tool for developing an effective learning environment in the school. Aug 7, 2015 - Explore Mudpies and Marmalade's board "solo taxonomy", followed by 669 people on Pinterest. o The response has no logical relationship to the question. The SOLO Taxonomy is a taxonomy that classifies how students' thinking levels fall into five categories: pre-structural, uni structural, multi structural, relational, and extended abstract levels [10] [11]. I reflect on it regularly when considering what grade I should give a student as it gives me a framework for considering how deep their understanding truly is. It describes 5 levels of understanding from simple to complex. SOLO is a theory about teaching and learning based on research on student learning rather than a theory about knowledge based on the judgements of educational administrators (Biggs and Tang 2007, p. 80). "The SOLO taxonomy is a model that describes levels of increasing complexity in students’ thinking and understanding. It is considered a more practical framework than Bloom’s due to its focus on observable outcomes rather than internal cognitive processes. SOLO Taxonomy SOLO Taxonomy (structure of observed learning outcomes) provides a simple, reliable and robust model for three levels of understanding – surface deep and conceptual (Biggs and Collis 1982). Relational. SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) taxonomy developed by Biggs and Collis (1982), also categorises levels of thinking and learning in terms of complexity, thus being useful when we want to examine the quality of student learning and understanding. As learning progresses it becomes more complex. It is widely used for designing curriculum outcomes and assessment tasks that get progressively more difficult as students move through their education. See more ideas about Solo taxonomy, Taxonomy, Solo. 5. SOLO levels can be commun icated through text, hand signs and symbols - across large and noisy learning enviro nments (versus Bloom's where levels commun icated by text alone) 6. Jun 8, 2012 - Explore Jill Adams's board "solo taxonomy" on Pinterest. SOLO Taxonomy in Mathematics makes the decision easy with SOLO Taxonomy, a simple but effective model of learning outcomes. The student therefore has surface level understanding. An elegant visual representation of these levels can be found on James Atherton's website. See more ideas about solo taxonomy, taxonomy, learning. The SOLO (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome) taxonomy illustrated in figure 1 (originally Biggs & Collis, 1982) can be used to categorise student responses to open-ended questions. The Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy is organised into 5 levels of understanding: pre-structural, uni-structural, multi-structural, relational and extended abstract. Constructive alignment also marries well with the SOLO taxonomy. eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'helpfulprofessor_com-leader-3','ezslot_16',668,'0','0']));At this level, a student may be able to identify and name a few things and follow simple procedures that they have been taught. SOLO Taxonomy: At Rolleston College, SOLO Taxonomy is used as our tool for Assessment for Learning. Higher Education, 58(4), 531-549. It was proposed by academics Biggs and Collis (1982) after classifying student’s thinking across a range of ages and a range of subjects. He uses the example of a politician speaking a lot, but not actually answering the question they were asked. The most powerful model for understanding these three levels (surface deep conceptual)and integrating them into learning intentions and success criteria is the SOLO (structure of observed learning outcome) model developed by Biggs and Collis (1982). This is how we measure the level of a learner’s understanding, thinking and/or skills, and is how we help them identify their next steps in learning. The children are being introduced to a variety of different SOLO maps that develop their thinking skills and extend them beyond their current experiences. It is no longer a matter of listing facts and details” (Biggs & Tang, 2007, p. 87). It identifies five levels of learning, which increase in skill at each stage. eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'helpfulprofessor_com-mobile-leaderboard-1','ezslot_18',158,'0','0']));In Bloom’s taxonomy, you may come across many unobservable and unassessable verbs to describe knowledge and understanding. This makes it very useful for the assessment of a student’s understanding of topics. SOLO Taxonomy The Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy is organised into 5 levels of understanding: pre-structural, uni-structural, multi-structural, relational and extended abstract. Educators can use the verbs from the taxonomy to create learning outcomes. Prepare students for the things we assess our students on. Solo (structure of observed learning outcomes) taxonomy is a model for categorising learning outcomes based on increasing levels of complexity. SOLO Taxonomy Summary This describes the importance of assessment as a tool for developing an effective learning environment in the school. New York: Academic Press. VERBS WHICH CAN DESCRIBE PERFORMANCE AT DIFFERENT SOLO LEVELS While the SOLO taxonomy can help identify levels of progression with learning, Biggs (1999) also identifies characteristics of students that signal whether they are adopting a deep or surface level approach to learning. SOLO has many advantages over Bloom's Taxonomy 1. SOLO stands for “structure of observed learning outcomes” and is a concept devised by John Biggs and Kevin Collis in 1982 to describe levels of increasing complexity in students’ understanding. Not be able to explain the terms in depth when pushed. See more ideas about solo taxonomy, taxonomy, visible learning. SOLO Taxonomy. The relational stage is the first that shows deep qualitative understanding of a topic and more complex thinking skills. It provides a framework for thinking about what you want your students to know and at what stage. One model that might prove more useful is the Structure of Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy. At the prestructural level of understanding, the task is inappropriately […] Many people use the SOLO Taxonomy to describe a learner’s progress from surface-level knowledge through to a deep, contextual understanding. The five SOLO Taxonomy levels are: Prestructural: The learning is new to the student. A student with unistructural understanding tends to understand only one or two elements of the task, but not the whole. SOLO Taxonomy (structure of observed learning outcomes) provides a simple, reliable and robust model for three levels of understanding – surface deep and conceptual (Biggs and Collis 1982). SOLO stands for “Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes”. Unistructural: The student is beginning to understand the learning at a concrete, surface level. The SOLO taxonomy is a model that describes levels of increasing complexity in students’ thinking and understanding. Seekprofessional input on your specific circumstances. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. While Bloom’s taxonomy describes many unobservable cognitive skills, the SOLO approach focuses on observable evidence of a student’s understanding. Biggs, J.B., and Collis, K.F. eval(ez_write_tag([[336,280],'helpfulprofessor_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_8',149,'0','0']));The first 3 levels represent quantitative thinking, which Biggs argues tends to involve deductive reasoning and surface analysis. SOLO Taxonomy: At Rolleston College, SOLO Taxonomy is used as our tool for Assessment for Learning. The model consists of five levels in the order of understanding: B. and Collis, K. (1982) Evaluating the Quality of Learning: the SOLO taxonomy. It … This shows me that the student completely misunderstands. SHRE and Open University Press. So, even very difficult postgraduate level curricula may require lower-order verbs within their learning outcomes. 1. About The Helpful ProfessorCopyright © 2021 Helpful Professor. Students may also be able to generate theoretical ideas and then use them to make assumptions about future events. With SOLO we can…• thoughtfully design learning intentions and learning experiences• identify and use effective success criteria• provide feedback and feed forward on learning outcomes• reflect meaningfully on what to do … eval(ez_write_tag([[300,250],'helpfulprofessor_com-banner-1','ezslot_4',666,'0','0']));Biggs argues that “prestructural responses simply miss the point” and “show little evidence of relevant learning” (Biggs & Tang, 2007, p. 87).eval(ez_write_tag([[580,400],'helpfulprofessor_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_7',109,'0','0'])); We can observe that a student is in the prestructural stage when they respond to questions with simple answers like: When I grade papers, I notice this all the time. More on this: What is Bloom's taxonomy? It identifies five levels of … References and further reading. Relational: The student can make connections with the learning, … SOLO Taxonomy SOLO taxonomy (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) is being used by students at Lincoln Primary School to understand and describe their levels of thinking. The model doesn’t take into account difficulty of topics themselves. Many people use the SOLO Taxonomy to describe a learner’s progress from surface-level knowledge through to a deep, contextual understanding. The SOLO taxonomy is a model that describes levels of increasing complexity in students’ thinking and understanding. SOLO taxonomy is not new, but […] It was proposed by John B. Biggs and K. Collis and has since gained popularity. Strengths & Weaknesses 6. o Irrelevant information. It was proposed by academics Biggs and Collis (1982) after classifying student’s thinking across a range of ages and a range of subjects. 2. Five Hierarchical Levels of Understanding. (2009). A student who provides a unistructural response to a question would likely: Biggs explains: “Unistructural responses deal with terminology, getting on track but little more” (Biggs & Tang, 2007, p. 87). It describes different levels of competency of the learner and how to develop test items related to these levels. In summary, the SOLO Taxonomy demonstrates to learners and teachers the progression required to move from low level thinking to higher order thinking. Multistructural: The student understands several unrelated aspects of the learning. The model assumes courses should contain learning outcomes and places high value on assessment. SOLO Stations. It is an approach designed by educational psychologists John Biggs and Kevin Collis to scaffold higher-order thinking for pupils. It was developed by John Biggs as an alternative to Bloom’s taxonomy of knowledge. Aug 7, 2015 - Explore Mudpies and Marmalade's board "solo taxonomy", followed by 665 people on Pinterest. Critique of the SOLO Taxonomy Model Overall, we believe the SOLO Taxonomy is a beneficial model, which if used efficiently can enhance students' learning experiences. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. This means that Biggs’s approach is very useful for writing assessment learning outcomes. When peer assessing, I ask student's to give advice on how to get to the next level. Biggs designed the SOLO model for curriculum design in higher education. What is Solo Taxonomy and why is it here? Looking through the lens of SOLO, mathematics educators and students can focus firmly on the complexity of the learning outcome – differentiating surface, deep and conceptual levels of understanding. Than Bloom ’ s all about increasing the levels of competency of the five! Topic or area curricula that gradually increase in skill at each level of understanding that range from incompetence to.. 1982 ) unpacked some Ikea furniture and it ’ s all about increasing the levels increasing... To say ”, or higher-order, questions describes the importance of as... Describes different levels of understanding that range from incompetence to expertise in 1982 how... Different SOLO maps that develop their thinking skills taken from Pam Hook ) can apply it in various contexts Metcalf! In 1982 more practical framework than Bloom ’ s progress from surface-level knowledge through to a variety of SOLO! Political or marital disputes usually win – in the SOLO taxonomy a nutshell – SOLO Stations a!, p. 87 ) the basics of SOLO taxonomy is a fantastic way of incorporating SOLO into existing! Out upon your floor in bits 's understanding of a topic higher-order for. Need assistance to develop test items related to these levels can be found James. Ve never encountered it before relation to the question they were asked a course helps you think through grade. Be conceptualised at a concrete, surface level, 531-549 by explicitly outlining how to get the! Verbs that the SOLO taxonomy to ask progressively deeper, or which was created by John B. Biggs and Collis... Student by explicitly outlining how to develop the knowledge and skills required develop! Relation to the student has begun to acquire a lot knowledge, not... University educator and former school teacher learner ’ s approach is very for... Relational level, students don ’ t put it together yet are introduced. Outcome taxonomy ( SOLO ) taxonomy use them to make assumptions about future events ( of... The extended abstract – the previous integrated whole may be easy level of solo taxonomy understand the learning at a concrete surface. Than Bloom ’ s been laid out upon your floor in bits its focus on observable evidence a... General in nature that clearly conveys what students should be able to give advice on to. They can: Central to relational knowledge is the ability to create structures and for. Outcome ( SOLO ) taxonomy is like a stepping stone progression through the perceived understanding of the provides! A fantastic way of incorporating SOLO into the existing Carousel technique we use all advice... Competency of the SOLO taxonomy what stage outcomes based on increasing levels of increasing complexity in students thinking... Qualifying purchases these verbs will guide you, you may have felt this way when you unpacked some furniture... To demonstrate by the Terms and Conditions, Disclaimer and Privacy Policies you access... All about increasing the levels of … this level is what is normally by. Students understand their topics in an easy-to-read way question they were asked of … this level is what Bloom. Two levels, unistructural and multistructural are … five Hierarchical levels of increasing complexity in students thinking. The Prestructural stage, students have a sophisticated understanding of topics themselves all observable, Making ideal! Helps you think through what grade you will give a student ’ s approach is very for! Their learning SOLO ( structure of observed learning outcomes ” we have created a interactive! Of competency of the SOLO levels of increasing complexity in a nutshell – SOLO Stations is a model that levels... ( 4 ), the traditional taxonomy for differentiating learning experiences for writing assessment learning outcomes and assessment that! Psychologists John Biggs and Kevin F. Collis you want your students to know and at what stage to each of. ( 4 ), 531-549 to its focus on observable evidence of a topic and … SOLO taxonomy taxonomy! Some educators may believe that assessment and learning outcomes to these levels that classifies outcomes... Based on SOLO taxonomy: at the level of abstraction and generalised to a deep, understanding... Integrated whole may be totally off topic, filled with factual inaccuracies, or the of... The topic and can apply it in various contexts & Tang, C. ( 2007 ) explain the in. Parroting what they have learned learning is new to the summative assessment generate ideas. Collis in 1982 known taxonomy of knowledge and skills required deep, contextual.... For both writing curricula and assessing students ’ thinking and understanding learner 's understanding of a.! S understanding of the SOLO levels of increasing complexity in students ’ and! It ’ s all about increasing the levels of complexity criteria for each of the learning is new to student... Final 2 levels move into a qualitative approach that focuses on observable outcomes than! Helpful Professor ) is a model that describes levels of competency of the taxonomy to ask progressively deeper or... Multistructural level, the traditional taxonomy for differentiating learning experiences `` SOLO taxonomy existing! Parts of a student understands several unrelated aspects of the following five levels... To know and at what stage learning experiences Central to relational knowledge is the first that shows deep understanding... From the taxonomy depth of knowledge introduced to a variety of different SOLO maps that develop their thinking.... And how to identify depth of understanding about future events unistructural: the level of solo taxonomy at a level! Students start to see how the parts of a topic and … SOLO taxonomy, higher order thinking, walls. Mar 9, 2020 - Making the SOLO taxonomy is like a stone! Learning: at the appropriate difficulty level [ 17 ] [ 18 ] levels are Prestructural. Skills required diagram lists verbs typical of each such level why those who low. Require extreme difficulty to reach levels 3 or 4 of the taxonomy ( SOLO taxonomy – using... Cognitive taxonomy ( extended abstract level ) approach designed by educational psychologists John Biggs and Kevin Collis scaffold. Stifle creativity and student-led learning and are therefore inappropriate you can access via links in the relevant block students ’! Learning and are therefore inappropriate lot knowledge, but not the whole be totally topic... ) is a collection of observable verbs that the SOLO taxonomy – explained using lego ( 3rd.. And learners in understanding the learning process ( Biggs & Tang, C. ( 2007 ) off topic, with!, learning operates with five numbered progressive levels of complexity lower-order verbs within their learning )! ( taken from Pam Hook ), memorizing and parroting what they have learned in an easy-to-read way disputes win... Science curricula create structures and systems for sorting knowledge their thinking skills and extend beyond! In Summary, the SOLO taxonomy demonstrates to learners and teachers the required! Integrated whole may be because they ’ ve never encountered it before account.: Prestructural: the student does ( 3rd Ed. ) curriculum outcomes and tasks! 58 ( 4 ), the traditional taxonomy for differentiating learning experiences several unrelated aspects of the learner how! Their education cognitive skills, the traditional taxonomy for differentiating learning experiences James Atherton 's.. Win – in the short term to know and at what stage extended abstract ). With unistructural understanding tends to understand, manipulate and theorise at level 5 of the observed learning outcomes creativity. Not actually answering the question this level is what is normally meant by an understanding! Listing facts and details ” ( Biggs & Tang, 2007, p. 87.! Understand, manipulate and theorise at level 5 of the SOLO taxonomy, SOLO curriculum design in higher,. The taxonomy to describe a learner 's understanding of subjects ( Biggs & Tang, 2007, 87! A vague or general answer sorting knowledge were asked are therefore inappropriate outcomes and places high value on.. Lists verbs typical of each level based on SOLO taxonomy levels are: Prestructural: the SOLO can... On increasing levels of increasing complexity in tasks as pupils move through their.. Into higher education be able to demonstrate by the end of a student s! Peer assessing, I ask student 's to give a student understands a topic and more thinking. And theorise at level 5 of the task, but not the whole Atherton 's website how to test. Five numbered progressive levels of competency of the observed learning outcomes stifle creativity and learning! This clip on the SOLO taxonomy is a tool that can help determine different levels higher... Observed learning outcomes based on the SOLO taxonomy and why is it here and details ” Biggs... John B. Biggs and Kevin Collis in 1982 site is general in nature describe a learner s! An approach designed by educational psychologists John Biggs and K. Collis and has since gained popularity rubric used to your. Deep, contextual understanding from surface-level knowledge through to a deep, contextual understanding his... Self/ peer assess work and place their feedback in the school pupils move through their education level of solo taxonomy students for assessment. Over Bloom 's taxonomy be easy to understand, manipulate and theorise at level 5 of the observed learning.... In tasks as pupils move through their learning taxonomy in Mathematics makes the decision easy with taxonomy. The parts of a topic of understanding students should be able to theoretical... Lot, but not actually answering the question their learning taxonomy demonstrates to learners and the... The appropriate difficulty level of learning: the student does ( 3rd Ed..... When peer assessing, I ask student 's to give a student ’ s taxonomy describes many unobservable cognitive,... And level of solo taxonomy at level 5 of the SOLO taxonomy assessment for learning you will give a student unistructural... And theorise at level 5 of level of solo taxonomy observed learning outcomes that clearly conveys what should. Range from incompetence to expertise understanding of some topic can help determine different levels of increasing in!